Thursday, August 16, 2018

अटल बिहारी बाजपेयी एक संपूर्ण राजनीतिक व्यक्तित्व तो नहीं, परन्तु अपनी जन्मजात वक्तृत्व प्रतिभा के बदौलत राजनीती के शीर्ष पर गए और वह भी इस कलियुगी दौर में  नैतिकता, भावुकता और आदर्शवादिता भरी राजनीती के बदौलत। निश्चित रूप से भारत में मूल्य आधारित राजनीती की अंतिम कड़ी। संसद में अपने गंभीर और बुलंद भाषणों, कांग्रेस की एकाधिकारी शासन व्यस्था के खिलाफ विपक्ष को खड़ा करने, अपनी सरकार में प्रतिभा और वरिष्ठता के हिसाब से सबको मौके देने तथा भारत व पाकिस्तान के बीच दोस्ती बढ़ाने को लेकर अपनी बेहद ईमानदार और बड़े दिल वाले पहल दिखाने के लिए उन्हें आज़ाद भारत के राजनीतिक इतिहास में  हमेशा याद रखा जायेगा।   
The question of criticism is not because Indian team lost two test matches in a row, The question is that of the rationality of team selection and keeping the batting order in logical manner. Indian team lost the winning momentum in very second ODI. It was because Virat send K L Rahul at no.4. Time and again, it has been proved Rahul can not bat at no. 4 in ODI. When he batted tremendously at no. 3 in TT Matches and Virat used to come at no. 4, then why he did not continue this in ODI matches.
In test matches, it was amply proved, other than Virat no Indian batsman deserves to bat in english condition. India lost first test match, but it was well fought loss, but in second test Indian team made horrendous selection. In seaming condition they kept two spinners. Virat dropped Shikhar, who might have been handy in that match, because of his fearless approach and also left right opening combination will have a much say in that match.
By selecting Hardik pandya in every match, Virat shows that he is very much obsessed with him. He even gives weighatge to Pandya over champion player like Ashwin. A captain should be never prejudiced with any player. Pandaya has far more remote chance to become all rounder like Kapildev. Pandya does not have character to be a champion player. In the third test match, Indian team must keep Rishabh pant in place of Dinesh Kartik, must replace Viay with Shikhar, Hardik must be replaced with Karun Nayar and Chinaman Yadav must be replaced with another yadav Umesh or Jaspreet Bumrah.

Sunday, August 12, 2018

My perception regarding Rahul Gandhi is quite different to the others.I find Rahul, a totally clean heart, sensible, issue based and activism orientation person, who does power politics only under pressure of his mother, the lady who is totally reverse to her son's character.I think Rahul must declare that he would never be PM of India,then he will have a much better ranking in the history as a person who being a Gandhi family clan, did not opt Primeministership.
Among the all Nehru-Gandhi clan, J L Nehru was best, to whom I have a great regard, because of his highest degree of intellectualism, idealism, a versatile genius, but anyhow he proved to be a person who committed mistake under the emotion, vary from partition issue to Kashmir issue and last with China issue.
Indira Gandhi was just reverse to his father, not an intellectual and idealist but emotionally strong, who proved herself, a dictator who took many hard decisions.
Mr. Rajiv Gandhi was sober, Jovial but it will be foolish to regard him a highly pro democratic and a person have had non dictatorial attitude, though he gave impression of a person who was reverse to this.
Rajiv also ruled the country in his mother style by keeping both PM and party president post in his own hand. Whenever Rajiv saw, some congress leader is onthe rise, he immediately cut short him. When Arjun Singh became second time CM of MP, Rajiv immediately dethrone him and make him governor of Punjab.
To me Sonia is worst among the Nehru clan, though she has been politically vert successful, But my measuring rod is different. I found Sonia injected many bad things in Congress party like her mother in law Indira Gandhi, like a cult of ultra aggression, identity oriented politics, vote catching populist schemes like MGNREGA and Food security etc and many kind of sectional appeasement politics. Though, these measure made congress successful, but brought country's economy and ethnicity under peril, the factors which ultimately defeated Congress party in 2014 election.
Now the Sonia's biggest agenda is to uplift his son Rahul' bridle as the harbinger of Congress party, but Rahul has no similar nature like his mother. He is not cunning and strategist like his mother and he can not speak lie loudly,by heart he is not a dictator. But now he is doing all odd things under pressure which does not match his basic instinct.
Those persons who say Rahul is incapable and pappu, they must understand this fact, Indira and Rajiv were also not the extraordinary great, They were also westernized sort of persons,only difference was that during their time people were ready to accept dynasty and multi party system was not so developed in country, political alternative was in making only and now Indian public and congress workers are not ready to worship dynasty high command in the same way, what they were doing before.

Friday, August 10, 2018

Two ex BJP men Yashwant Sinha and Arun Shourie and as usual all time anti corruption but anti BJP activist Prashant Bhushan yesterday presented their strong anti remark over RAFAEL deal being done with France. This issue was vehemently raised by Rahul, but still this deal did not prove to be a major scam operated under this Modi govt.
Prima facie two objectionable points get emerged out of this deal. First, how the cost of one plane scaled up just three times more, what it was earlier dealt upon. It just shoot up from around 500 crore to 1600 crore and second how the almost bankrupt company ADAG RELIANCE was made a true example of crony capitalism under this deal by this govt. Though this govt, very cleverly has not directly benefited this company, rather it has indirectly facilitated this company to make it India partner and to get benefit out of this.
On the merit of this issue, the objection raised by two BJP men is OK., but their intention behind this exposition is just to express their frustration. This was the Arun Shourie, who first of all termed Narendra Modi as prime ministerial material in year 2005, Why he had said so, was it because Modi gained a Hindu poster boy image during Gurjarat riots and this was pacifying the hard core right wing ideology of Arun SHourie. This was the Yashwant Sinha who openly opposed Advani and pleaded to make Narendra Modi as leader of the BJP in year 2012. He met Modi in Ahmadabad and make arrangement of election ticket for his son in lieu of himself.

Tuesday, August 7, 2018

I am amazed, some so called top gun journos, who have been ousted or fired from their organisations, they are now talking about the concern of FOURTH ESTATE. What a hypocrisy, from their part, when they have their legs in power shoes of Media, then have only political agendas to play with, whether that is being Right to the center or being left to the center. Now when they come on the road, they talk about words of autonomy and freedom of Media. I always feel, that Media always needs the status like Judiciary, but these sort of journos, who are actually the tales of the corporate, they keep making mockery of these things.
The event of Muzaffarpur and Deoria and perhaps of many, which have no revelation ! Apart from this,the incident of off and on rape with the minor girls,what it shows? It undoubtedly shows, a deep sexual perversion of the Indian society, which have even gone to such extent.In general, the rape and murder of adulteress and its related complexities of the situations may have some arguable points. But, as far as such incidents of rape and murder of minors are concerned, it is just a havoc with the humanity. For this, we can not always blame our public system, it is rather our public society, which has got such a degenerated level. Really we are living in KALIYUGA in all respect.
The event of Muzaffarpur and Deoria and perhaps of many, which have no revelation ! Apart from this,the incident of off and on rape with the minor girls,what it shows? It undoubtedly shows, a deep sexual perversion of the Indian society, which have even gone to such extent.In general, the rape and murder of adulteress and its related complexities of the situations may have some arguable points. But, as far as such incidents of rape and murder of minors are concerned, it is just a havoc with the humanity. For this, we can not always blame our public system, it is rather our public society, which has got such a degenerated level. Really we are living in KALIYUGA in all respect.

Sunday, August 5, 2018

असम में 40 लाख लोगो की भारतीय नागरिकता की पात्रता सूची से विलग हो जाने वाली रिपोर्ट को लेकर देश भर में अलग अलग मंचो पर जो द्विपक्षीय और दोध्रुवीय विश्लेषण हो रहा है, उसमें इस समस्या का ना तो कारण दिखेगा और ना ही समाधान। इस पर मै कुछ लिखने को विवश हुआ। विवश इसलिए की ये चालीस लाख लोग तकनीकी रूप से भारत के नागरिक भले नहीं हों ,जिसमे भूल वश हुई गैर पात्रता शामिल नहीं है, पर ये व्यक्ति मानवीय दृष्टि से , मानवशास्त्रीय दृष्टि से, ऐतिहासिक दृष्टि से , भारतीय जनजीवन और संस्कृति की दृष्टि से और अखंड भारतीय इतिहास के डीएनए के हिसाब से उसी भारत के ही तो हिस्से है। आखिर इस समस्या की जड़े कहा से शुरू होती है। जिन लोगो ने देश को सांप्रदायिक रूप से विभाजित करने का महा पाप किया, जिन्होंने विभाजन के दंगो में दस लाख लोगो की बलि ली, आज इसी का ही नतीजा है की असम के 40 लाख लोग और ना जाने बांग्लादेश से पाकिस्तान गए लाखो उर्दूभाषी बिहारी मुसलमानों को यह जिल्लत सहनी पड़ी है। यह सभी लोग मूल रूप से भारतीय है ,ठीक वैसे ही जैसे पश्चिम स्थित पाकिस्तान और पूर्व स्थित बांग्लादेश मूल में भारत देश की ही सरजमीं है।
द्विराष्ट्रवाद सिद्धांत देकर देश का विभाजन करने वाला इस मुल्क का महाखलनायक जिन्ना इतना बड़ा पाप करने के बाद अपने पोलिटिकल shrewdness और वेस्टर्न सोफिस्टिकेशन की वजह से अभी भी कई बौद्धिकों और यहाँ तक के भारत के भी कई लोगो की डार्लिंग बनता है। वह जिन्ना जो निजी जीवन में घोर प्रोग्रेसिव, सेक्युलर और कम्पलीट गैर इस्लामिक था पर राजनितिक जीवन में वही शक्श उतना ही फसादी , इस्लामिस्ट और अलगाववादी था। जो जिन्ना अपने समूचे जीवन में अपने राजनीतिक महत्वाकांक्षा में कभी मुस्लिम लीग तो कभी कांग्रेस , कभी ब्रिटिश कोएटरी तो कभी भारतीय बिज़नेस टाइकून के संग अपने पाला बदलता रहता था।
वही जिन्ना 1935 इंडिया एक्ट में सेपरेट कम्युनल इलेक्टोरेट का प्रोविज़न देखकर वाल पर लिखा सेंटेंस पहचान लिया और फिर शुरू होता है मुस्लिम कम्युनल पॉलिटिक्स की उसकी भयानक कम्पैन। 1946 की प्रांतीय अस्सेम्ब्ली के चुनाव में जिन्ना की मुस्लिम लीग को हैरतनाक सफलता दिलाकर पाकिस्तान की स्थापना का मार्ग प्रशस्त करने वाले लोग पाकिस्तान के मुस्लिम तो कत्तई नहीं थे। इनके पक्ष में मतदान करने वाले सबसे अव्वल तो यूपी , सीपी , बिहार और उसी बंगाल के थे। वही बंगाल जो कम्युनल बिभाजन के बाद भी भारत स्थित बंगाल में मुस्लिम की करीब 25 प्रतिशत आबादी बसती है ,वही बंगाल के 40 लाख मुस्लिम जो माइग्रेट कर असम में है। यह कौन सा डेमोग्राफिक लॉजिक बनता है।
ममता दीदी इस एनआरसी फैसले को लेकर जो चिंता जता रही है , वह चिंता तो उन्हें अपने बंग भंग को लेकर जतानी चाहिए।
देश के हिन्दुओ को यहाँ के मुसलमानो से घृणा करने की जरुरत नहीं है। भारत के कथित मुसलमानो ने अरब में फली फूली मजहब का आवरण जरूर ओढा है, पर जीवविज्ञानी दृष्टि से वह वह भारतीय ही है, धीरे धीरे उन्हें जब अपनी हकीकत और ऐतिहासिक तथ्य का पता लगेगा तो खुद शर्मसार होंगे और भारत-पाक बांग्ला के पुनर एकीकरण का मार्ग प्रशस्त करेंगे। हिन्दू और मुस्लिम दोनों जब अपने इतिहास का सही रूप से दीदार करेंगे तो समस्या का अपनेआप समाधान हो जायेगा।
आखिर हिन्दू धरम की वर्णव्यस्था और दूसरी मुस्लिम समाज का ऐतहासिक भारतीय सच पर आत्मावलोकन हो जाये तो फिर राष्ट्र और धर्म दोनों का एकीकरण हो जायेगा। कम से कम मुझे तो इस बात का जरूर भरोसा है।