There was a time, when land reform was one of the big issue in the political economic domain of the country, now it has been replaced by the issue of land acquisition. But the land acquisition issue is being presented in such a way, as if the farming community residing in the outskirts of metropolis and urban centers do not want to sale their land and govt. & corporate are forcibly acquiring their land. These farmers definitely want to cash the opportunity, they are just trying to get as much as prices of their land and for that they are bargaining with the purchaser of land. I think this landowner class residing in outskirts of urban ares , actually do not represent the whole farming community of the country. these are land lords few, who have amassed huge wealth because of urbanization, in terms of land sale and rent both. i want to say that why the clause of 75 percent has been kept, why not either zero or full 100 percent support clause. this 75 percent clause will promote bargaining, bribing and politics of support, ultimately slowing the path of project. the best option is that, for the big project, there should be concept of land bank which will work for both land seller and land buyer in urban, metropolis area. Ultimately we need a complete policy over urbanization,so that we have sustainability of agriculture in every respect. In case of strategic and governance matter, i think there is no dissentment